PostLake

What people build on PostLake

The same API, seen from eight different situations. Find the one shaped like yours.

• AI agents: The case PostLake was built for. An agent that can write a post but cannot publish it is only half an agent.
• SaaS products: Your users want to publish from inside your app. You do not want to spend a quarter building that.
• Marketing agencies: Many clients, many accounts, one integration, and no seat licences.
• Content repurposing: One idea, nine places, without nine copies of the same code.
• AI content tools: You have solved the writing. Publishing is the other half, and it is more tedious than it looks.
• E-commerce: Your catalogue already knows what launched. Your social accounts should not need telling separately.
• Newsrooms and publishers: The story is live. It should already be on every network, not queued behind somebody's afternoon.
• Social media tools: If you are building the product, you should not also be building nine platform integrations underneath it.

The thread running through all of them

Every one of these is really the same problem: publishing to social networks is nine integrations wearing a trench coat, and each one has its own permissions, its own media rules and its own way of failing. PostLake is one integration with those differences declared rather than discovered, so whichever of the situations above is yours, the platform-specific work is the part you are skipping.

Where an audience needs something PostLake does not do, the page says so. A use case that has to be stretched to fit is not a use case.